Announcement

Collapse
1 of 2 < >

Please update your bookmarks!!

If you use a bookmark as a way of getting to this site, please update it. The new link should include https:// before the rest of the URL. If you are having difficulty logging in, this is likely the cause.

Thanks and happy football season!
2 of 2 < >

FORUM POSTING RULES - Read before posting

Forum Rules.

(1) The guiding principle for posting in this forum is moderate yourselves.

(2) Don't write a post that attacks, impugns or denigrates another poster's character. There's an obvious difference between the language of humor and hateful, debased language. Know the difference and post accordingly.

(3) This is a Michigan sports forum. The forum welcomes posts from M's sports rivals. Talking smack, posting sass is what college sports rivalries are all about. Rules (1) and (2) above apply. If you don't want to view the posts of a rival talking smack or sassing, use the ignore feature in User Controls.

(4) This forum is about sharing thoughts, ideas and viewpoints about all sports, any number of subjects and issues, learning stuff from other posters and having fun. There are threads by subject matter within the forum for doing this. Keep the threads on point.

NB: The rules above are not intended to build a case to ban a poster. There are consequences for rule breaking as specified below. That's as far as it should go. Only the most egregious and persistent rule breaking would cause the moderators to consider a ban.

Due Process.

(1) The forum has 6 moderators. Jeff Buchanan, Jon, JD, Hannibal, Oracle, Entropy. None of them want to moderate adult posters who should know better. There may be posts that break the rules.

(2) Posters who, at the sole discretion of a moderator, break a rule will be given a warning post that will site one of the rules listed above as the reason for the deletion.

(3) If the rule breaking behavior continues, a moderator can remove an offending post and any ensuing post that whines about that action. If a moderator removes a post(s) the reason for the removal(s) will be posted with the removal notice that appears in the thread. This should be the end of it. Man up, take responsibility for breaking the rules. The forum moves on. If not, see below.

(4) A poster who has had a warning or a post(s) removed can certify a question by PM to any moderator about that action. Do not complain about the action or attempt to make your case in the forum/threads. Moderators shall do their best to address the question within 72h. At the end of 72h the majority opinion of the moderators responding will be the answer.

(5) Banning a poster for egregious and repeated rule breaking requires a unanimous vote to ban from all 6 moderators. We don't anticipate this will ever happen.
See more
See less

Miscellaneous And Off Topic Subjects

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by The Oracle View Post

    So a court ruling saying it's constitutional to put on money is lol cause the article says there's been no ruling against using the phrase? I'm confused.

    Also. amusing and predictable that's all you take from the article.

    But FAKE NUZE!!!!
    Point is I quit reading after the first few sentences. It straight up lied about the facts. There was a decision of a court last week on the phrase In God We Trust on our money. the article lied to make it seem like Trump lied.

    Now if an article about Trump's lies is going to start out by telling a lie to make it seem like Trump lies a lot, there is absolutely no point in reading the rest of the article.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by crashcourse View Post
      you want more?

      gee they were all on Anthony wieners laptop no way china could have got them

      bwahahaha

      https://www.realclearinvestigations...._examined.html
      I have a feeling that those specific 3000 emails that were directly reviewed were hand picked by the person heading that investigation, Peter Stzrok himself.

      Comment


      • 56g4h4IotZqx4IkKBZtobFs_ja8l2fa87kc8PyicltI.png?w=619&amp;s=f7ff14086f9e6cf407098b78636fcb2b.png

        Comment


        • Just because the hackers successfully phished Podesta does not mean that enable to hack a private server. This isn't tv where you have some mystical black hat hacker that can get into any server within minutes.

          Comment


          • btw CNN this is how you research a story cite sources and put it together

            https://www.realclearinvestigations...._examined.html

            Comment


            • Originally posted by froot loops View Post
              Just because the hackers successfully phished Podesta does not mean that enable to hack a private server. This isn't tv where you have some mystical black hat hacker that can get into any server within minutes.
              Comey said it was likely an 8th grader could have hacked Clinton's server and covered their tracks, there was absolutely no security.

              Likewise, do you think Wiener's laptop was secured?

              Comment


              • not a peep from those #GentryProgs

                fzNCV6mpkeZWal6PDxVvDbQ5GTc8-M_ggB7P4hbkgmM.png?w=606&amp;s=d791fb63dd6fe621a2d6ee031050c023.png

                Comment


                • What professor really told FBI about Trump, Russia and Papadopoulos


                  http://thehill.com/hilltv/rising/404...d-papadopoulos

                  Comment


                  • RJeTTeDHcQyB9_4-YX5pDkdWU69hAmn7Y6gjmkA8aYU.jpg?w=768&amp;s=0051a5001fcb6615a67b0f011a2092d5.jpg

                    Comment


                    • A whole page. Damn Kapture.

                      Comment


                      • Churchill was talking about him saying, "he won't change his mind and won't change the subject."

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by millenwasmyfavorite View Post
                          A whole page. Damn Kapture.
                          Use the idiot invisibility button.

                          Screenshot 2018-08-30 at 5.08.59 PM.png

                          Problem solved

                          In Columbus, of course, the fanbase holds the University accountable for doing the wrong thing. -Talent, Esq-

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by crashcourse View Post
                            [The IG report] "acknowledged that the FBI investigation and its forensic analysis did not find evidence that Clinton’s email server systems were compromised."

                            https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/don...-email-n904811


                            so let me get this straight

                            when Russia did it likely giving it to wikileaks the attitude is collusion with trump to influence the elections he's going down how dare he be involved in publishing hillarys emails etc etc

                            but when china is named as the hacker the attitude is nothing to see here move along this didn't happen Hillary was a saint and no one other then the Russians could have hacked those emails and these emails weren't hacked

                            Really? the defense is the chinese couldn't do what the Russians already did?


                            What's the evidence that China hacked her server other than the Daily Caller article which uses two anonymous sources? The IG report specifically states that there's no evidence the server was compromised. Are you aware of other evidence?

                            Comment


                            • BTW... Haha

                              40326592_2448723911821095_956492970620616704_n.jpg?_nc_cat=0&amp;oh=ec1a7240b76ae5581fd0ab579de89798&amp;oe=5BEEFD87.jpg
                              In Columbus, of course, the fanbase holds the University accountable for doing the wrong thing. -Talent, Esq-

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by CGVT View Post

                                Use the idiot invisibility button.

                                Screenshot 2018-08-30 at 5.08.59 PM.png

                                Problem solved
                                I know, I get that I could mute him. I am just generally opposed to it -- even though he copped out and ignored me like a coward for asking him his BCT ship date.

                                but, honestly, I feel like this is the descent on a long plane ride, I'm periodically waking up to haphazardly gauge how close we are to landing -- all while having a pretty good sense that the guy two rows ahead, who has assured everyone he isn't getting sick (Kapture), is primed to blow spectacular chunks all over the plane once it has finally landed (mueller conclusion). I guess I am kind of waiting for that melt down.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X