FORUM POSTING RULES - Read before posting

Forum Rules.

(1) The guiding principle for posting in this forum is moderate yourselves.

(2) Don't write a post that attacks, impugns or denigrates another poster's character. There's an obvious difference between the language of humor and hateful, debased language. Know the difference and post accordingly.

(3) This is a Michigan sports forum. The forum welcomes posts from M's sports rivals. Talking smack, posting sass is what college sports rivalries are all about. Rules (1) and (2) above apply. If you don't want to view the posts of a rival talking smack or sassing, use the ignore feature in User Controls.

(4) This forum is about sharing thoughts, ideas and viewpoints about all sports, any number of subjects and issues, learning stuff from other posters and having fun. There are threads by subject matter within the forum for doing this. Keep the threads on point.

NB: The rules above are not intended to build a case to ban a poster. There are consequences for rule breaking as specified below. That's as far as it should go. Only the most egregious and persistent rule breaking would cause the moderators to consider a ban.

Due Process.

(1) The forum has 6 moderators. Jeff Buchanan, Jon, JD, Hannibal, Oracle, Entropy. None of them want to moderate adult posters who should know better. There may be posts that break the rules.

(2) Posters who, at the sole discretion of a moderator, break a rule will be given a warning post that will site one of the rules listed above as the reason for the deletion.

(3) If the rule breaking behavior continues, a moderator can remove an offending post and any ensuing post that whines about that action. If a moderator removes a post(s) the reason for the removal(s) will be posted with the removal notice that appears in the thread. This should be the end of it. Man up, take responsibility for breaking the rules. The forum moves on. If not, see below.

(4) A poster who has had a warning or a post(s) removed can certify a question by PM to any moderator about that action. Do not complain about the action or attempt to make your case in the forum/threads. Moderators shall do their best to address the question within 72h. At the end of 72h the majority opinion of the moderators responding will be the answer.

(5) Banning a poster for egregious and repeated rule breaking requires a unanimous vote to ban from all 6 moderators. We don't anticipate this will ever happen.
See more
See less

Rutgers @ Michigan game day - in game - post game discussion

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    TD, Mr. Peppers.

    21-3, good guys. I guess that was technically a running play.


    • #17
      let's keep in mind we're learning nothing about our team today.

      At the risk of being called Hannidena, after the past two weeks, I am still worried that our team has hit a wall in terms of the continuous improvement train ... the running game case in point.

      Worried about Indy and PSU.


      • #18
        So far we've learned what we already knew, Rutgers is poop.


        • #19
          Rutgers beats Michigan's special teams for a kickoff return TD.

          21-10, good guys. There's already been more scoring in this one than I thought there would be.


          • #20
            That's a bit better from the running game.


            • #21
              28-10. That didn't take long. Now, let's see Michigan cover a kick.


              • #22
                Rutgers is poop.


                • #23
                  Meh.. Rutgers is poop
                  F#*K OHIO!!!


                  • #24
                    Hoosiers leading Iowa.


                    • #25
                      Got beaten on a double move again.


                      • #26
                        Not a good sequence for the Michigan defense.


                        • #27
                          Peppers is fierce man.
                          F#*K OHIO!!!


                          • #28


                            • #29
                              I know he likes the idea of being the next woodson but he's so much more physical. Dude is a baller
                              F#*K OHIO!!!


                              • #30
                                I always compared him to Patrick Peterson just based on talent and very similar body (weight, height).
                                Peterson hardly played offense at LSU though. Peppers might turn out to be better.

                                Peppers = amazing.
                                AAL 2018 - Teez Tabor