FORUM POSTING RULES - Read before posting

Forum Rules.

(1) The guiding principle for posting in this forum is moderate yourselves.

(2) Don't write a post that attacks, impugns or denigrates another poster's character. There's an obvious difference between the language of humor and hateful, debased language. Know the difference and post accordingly.

(3) This is a Michigan sports forum. The forum welcomes posts from M's sports rivals. Talking smack, posting sass is what college sports rivalries are all about. Rules (1) and (2) above apply. If you don't want to view the posts of a rival talking smack or sassing, use the ignore feature in User Controls.

(4) This forum is about sharing thoughts, ideas and viewpoints about all sports, any number of subjects and issues, learning stuff from other posters and having fun. There are threads by subject matter within the forum for doing this. Keep the threads on point.

NB: The rules above are not intended to build a case to ban a poster. There are consequences for rule breaking as specified below. That's as far as it should go. Only the most egregious and persistent rule breaking would cause the moderators to consider a ban.

Due Process.

(1) The forum has 6 moderators. Jeff Buchanan, Jon, JD, Hannibal, Oracle, Entropy. None of them want to moderate adult posters who should know better. There may be posts that break the rules.

(2) Posters who, at the sole discretion of a moderator, break a rule will be given a warning post that will site one of the rules listed above as the reason for the deletion.

(3) If the rule breaking behavior continues, a moderator can remove an offending post and any ensuing post that whines about that action. If a moderator removes a post(s) the reason for the removal(s) will be posted with the removal notice that appears in the thread. This should be the end of it. Man up, take responsibility for breaking the rules. The forum moves on. If not, see below.

(4) A poster who has had a warning or a post(s) removed can certify a question by PM to any moderator about that action. Do not complain about the action or attempt to make your case in the forum/threads. Moderators shall do their best to address the question within 72h. At the end of 72h the majority opinion of the moderators responding will be the answer.

(5) Banning a poster for egregious and repeated rule breaking requires a unanimous vote to ban from all 6 moderators. We don't anticipate this will ever happen.
See more
See less

Rutgers @ Michigan game day - in game - post game discussion

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    rutgers is beyond poop ... way beyond.


    • #32
      I know it's coming against a bad pass defense, but this is still the best half Jake Rudock's played all year. If you're looking for a real positive from a game that probably isn't going to tell us much, that's probably it.

      35-13, good guys.


      • #33
        That's a bad penalty by Stribling. A lot of sloppy defensive play this half.


        • #34
          Well done, Jarrod Wilson. Somebody needed to slam the door on that drive.


          • #35
            Very nice INT.


            • #36
              Some of these penalties are hilarious.

              "Intention to deceive?" That's a real penalty?


              • #37
                I've never seen that penalty called.
                AAL 2018 - Teez Tabor


                • #38
                  That's a real penalty. You can't do that. Good call.


                  • #39
                    can someone show me where that is in the rule book?

                    "Substitution with an intent to deceive" ... that's a penalty?? ... F'in bullcrap


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by JRB View Post
                      That's a real penalty. You can't do that. Good call.
                      No it wasn't. It wasn't a substitution. Michigan got penalized because the defense didn't line up correctly.

                      Butt ran out of the huddle early like he was going to leave the game, but there were 11 men in the huddle to start and no substitution.

                      As the penalty was explained, it was a bad call by an overzealous ref that tried to be cute with an obscure call.

                      Rutgers failed to line up on defense. Their fault.
                      Last edited by Kstat; November 7th, 2015, 05:23 PM.


                      • #41
                        Yes, it's illegal if Butt didn't come from the huddle.


                        • #42
                          Read-option should be illegal if you can't do that.


                          • #43
                            These refs seem to have money on the pont spread.


                            • #44
                              At this point I'm surprised when we don't get flagged for something.


                              • #45
                                Once again, Michigan can't get a targeting call.