Announcement

Collapse

FORUM POSTING RULES - Read before posting

Forum Rules.

(1) The guiding principle for posting in this forum is moderate yourselves.

(2) Don't write a post that attacks, impugns or denigrates another poster's character. There's an obvious difference between the language of humor and hateful, debased language. Know the difference and post accordingly.

(3) This is a Michigan sports forum. The forum welcomes posts from M's sports rivals. Talking smack, posting sass is what college sports rivalries are all about. Rules (1) and (2) above apply. If you don't want to view the posts of a rival talking smack or sassing, use the ignore feature in User Controls.

(4) This forum is about sharing thoughts, ideas and viewpoints about all sports, any number of subjects and issues, learning stuff from other posters and having fun. There are threads by subject matter within the forum for doing this. Keep the threads on point.

NB: The rules above are not intended to build a case to ban a poster. There are consequences for rule breaking as specified below. That's as far as it should go. Only the most egregious and persistent rule breaking would cause the moderators to consider a ban.

Due Process.

(1) The forum has 6 moderators. Jeff Buchanan, Jon, JD, Hannibal, Oracle, Entropy. None of them want to moderate adult posters who should know better. There may be posts that break the rules.

(2) Posters who, at the sole discretion of a moderator, break a rule will be given a warning post that will site one of the rules listed above as the reason for the deletion.

(3) If the rule breaking behavior continues, a moderator can remove an offending post and any ensuing post that whines about that action. If a moderator removes a post(s) the reason for the removal(s) will be posted with the removal notice that appears in the thread. This should be the end of it. Man up, take responsibility for breaking the rules. The forum moves on. If not, see below.

(4) A poster who has had a warning or a post(s) removed can certify a question by PM to any moderator about that action. Do not complain about the action or attempt to make your case in the forum/threads. Moderators shall do their best to address the question within 72h. At the end of 72h the majority opinion of the moderators responding will be the answer.

(5) Banning a poster for egregious and repeated rule breaking requires a unanimous vote to ban from all 6 moderators. We don't anticipate this will ever happen.
See more
See less

Maryland @ Michigan, Game Day and Post Game Discussion

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Well people here think O'korn is the better option for our team based on what they've seen, so who the fuck knows....

    Comment


    • #17
      I'm not sure how the positions are related other than being bad. Anyway, I've said too much on this thread, do I'll see myself out.
      Dan Patrick: What was your reaction to [Urban Meyer being hired]?
      Brady Hoke: You know.....not....good.

      Comment


      • #18
        I think the O'Korn conjecture has stopped

        Comment


        • #19
          yes ... Speight has shown enough to shut down that discussion.

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by The Oracle View Post
            I guess we're in a good spot when a 17 point win vs a ranked team isn't something we can be happy about.

            No one said anything about a blowout, but no one was exactly worried, except the select few around here. Montez has pretty much been as good as Luifau, but that's too objective for these parts.
            hmm... seems to me you are changing the point of discussion. No one said anything about not being happy with a 17 point win ... the point was that getting 45 points was not running up the score on Leavitt.

            Anyways, I give up ... surrender cobra here.

            Comment


            • #21
              Hmm. I though the point was that a coach being familiar with a JH offense made for a blowout to be impossible.

              I give up too...I guess I understand where dumb discussions come from when there isn't much to bitch about.

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by Jeff Buchanan View Post
                Hanni, the opening line is M by 29.5. If I take that line or predict an M score of say 43-13 am I a blithering idiot?
                No. I expect us to cover.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by The Oracle View Post
                  Fuck ME???? Fuck YOU!!!!
                  You guys need to get a room.
                  Get 'er done Matthew!

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by The Oracle View Post
                    Hmm......I give up too...I guess I understand where dumb discussions come from when there isn't much to bitch about.
                    It's a lot like this forum in June.
                    On Harbaugh's expectations for M football in 2015 (NFL NETWORK): “We'd rather be about it than talk about it."

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by The Oracle View Post
                      Fuck ME???? Fuck YOU!!!!
                      Thank you! It's a game, and we're here to have fun.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        One of my favorite write ups is out: S&P+ Five Factors Matchup: UM vs. Maryland.

                        M is favored in 4/5 of the major 5 and 23/25 of the sub categories.

                        There's a way to use a formula to predict a score from this stuff but it is beyond me. There's usually some math or statistics major who'll do it and if he does, I'll post the predicted scored based on the 5 factors.

                        Cliff Notes:

                        On offence (M O vs Maryland D), M has an efficiency rating of 52.1% (the national average is 40%

                        On defense (MD O vs M D, MD) has an efficiency rating of 24.9%

                        FEI does efficiency ratings differently than ESPN and I think the ESPN efficiency numbers are easier to interpret so, I'll trhow them out to compare. 86% of the time when M has the ball it puts itself in a position to move the chains. Maryland's offense does that 60% of the time.

                        But, the Five Factors numbers let you look at PPP or points per play both on standard downs and passing downs. According to Five Factors, these numbers reflect how explosive an offense is in those two settings and MD is more explosive than M is (1.01 ppp/1.33pp).

                        This has held true for M when it faced Colorado, PSU, Wisconsin, RU, MSU and that certainly was not predictive of the outcomes. You have to be careful interpreting these numbers IsoPPP considers successful plays only, of which there are not a great number against the UM defense. Moreover, the success rate for UM is about 70% greater than Maryland.

                        What does this mean vs. MD? It means, as usual, big chunk plays can be a problem when you, as a fan, watch these games and the eyeball test says exactly that. I'm not convinced it's Brown's aggressive scheme, maybe partly, but I think missed tackles contribute to this more and that was certainly the case in the MSU game. When you get that sinking, nervous stomach feeling, reassure yourself opponents are going to break a few plays against M's D but that usually has little to do with the outcome of the game. One of the prime reasons for that, something none of this kind of analysis shows, is the critical interplay between all facets of the game ...... O, D, ST, field position, time remaining, how the officials are calling the game, what's in the minds of the players on both sides of the field, all of that and some of it doesn't reduce that well to stats; some of it does (e.g., down and distance decision point matrices).
                        On Harbaugh's expectations for M football in 2015 (NFL NETWORK): “We'd rather be about it than talk about it."

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          No reason it should be close.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            I'm thinking 40+ for M, 10+ for MD.

                            The thing that has impressed me about JH's offense is that it is so incredibly varied. He does all kinds of stuff with his backs, his TE's, Darboh and, I hope Grant Perry is back. Big factor in the slot that I don't think Peppers is. I also want to see Peppers throw it. Against MSU, where M settled for a Kenny Allen FG to go up 30-17. On 3rd down and 8 (goal at 10), Peppers is in the wild cat. He absolutely makes the right read on the MLOS who is crashing inside and keeps taking it outside. He gets eaten up by a S that was unblocked. The S lets Chesson (?) go. If he takes a look just to his right, Chesson (I think it is) is wide open for a TD if he throws it. I can't imagine that it wasn't drawn up that way but Peppers just didn't take the throw and kept instead. Beautiful play design. This is what I'm talking about with how hard this offense is to defend and that's without a run threat from the QB.

                            Heard some rumblings that Mone could but won't play (rolled ankle). Same with Glasgow also nursing an injury.
                            On Harbaugh's expectations for M football in 2015 (NFL NETWORK): “We'd rather be about it than talk about it."

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              That softens the interior D-line significantly.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                I'd much rather Mone and Glasgow take a breather against Maryland to be healthy for Iowa.
                                F#*K OHIO!!!

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X