Tweet
I much, much prefer 2 DT's, love myself two dominant DT's who both force double teams. Teams like UF, USC, LSU have had front fours who could dominate with no need to blitz a LB. I'd love to land Pipkens right next to O'Brien but that would be a luxury, more likely M only lands one of the two. I just hope its not because they only want 1 of the 2.
-
-
then BPA
pardon my ignorance wm, what is a BPA.Comment
-
Best player available.Comment
-
BRA maybe more appropriate; best recruit available.Comment
-
Now you have me really confused.
Thanks!
Comment
-
Michigan, for some reason, has said that they are only going to take 1 DT. Seems weird given the recruiting failures of the past few years. Even if we were going to a 3-4, I'd still want two DTs, and with no QB in this class on probably not an RB, we've got room.Comment
-
I think they'll take a top DL no matter if he's a DT or DE."What you're doing, speaks so loudly, that I can't hear what you are saying"Comment
-
I don't think they'll pass on 2 top DT if they can get them.
BRA should be left up to the cheerleader coach.Comment
-
Going BRA-less an option, then?Comment
-
It has been for a coupla years now, and the fortunes of the program have sagged.Comment
-
gravity always winsComment
-
M considering taking another cornerback, Armani Reeves is at the top of their board... He'd take one of the BRA...Comment
-
You can never have too many good DBs.Comment
-
That's not a good sign. Reading the tea leaves, it looks like the staff expects a decommit from Terry Richardson.Comment
-
Probably wouldn't be disastrous."What you're doing, speaks so loudly, that I can't hear what you are saying"Comment
Comment