Speaking of Fatty Matty Patty…….. this for myself and Dpatnod……. Those were the days. Proper laugh out louds……. And still are.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Fire Dan Campbell!
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by TheLondonLion View PostHow were we betrayed by Stafford?
He had every right to go and not go through another rebuild. We got a good haul out of it and we have a hell of a roster built for long term success.
Staff got his chip, we got juice for the rebuild. Win win.
Maybe it's an oversimplification but right now we could have a banged up Stafford minus Jamo and Gibbs. No Gibbs means no LaPorta either but no Jamo means no trading up and losing other picks. So basically it's fair to say we could imagine Stafford on this team without our two top picks that aren't even doing anything. There is a world where he could be winning with us and he threw it away. I guess I feel betrayed because he was my favorite player by far for so long. Now he's nothing to me."Yeah, we just... we don't want them to go. So that's our motivation."
Dan Campbell at Green Bay, January 8, 2023.
- Top
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tom View PostI have to say, I never felt great about the hot starts under Caldwell or the hot starts in the later years under Schwartz, but this one feels good. They’re doing it with strong line play on both sides of the ball."Yeah, we just... we don't want them to go. So that's our motivation."
Dan Campbell at Green Bay, January 8, 2023.
- Top
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by chemiclord View Post
Well, I mean... that has a sample size of two."Yeah, we just... we don't want them to go. So that's our motivation."
Dan Campbell at Green Bay, January 8, 2023.
- Top
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by chemiclord View Post
All I'm saying is that while saying "always finished stronger than they started" is technically true, it would have any statistician grimacing in pain.
0-11-1, then 3-3
1-6, then 8-2
No statistician on earth will think that the win probability has remained the same from start to finish. And what would you call the win chance? 50/50 if we agree to ignore the tie? Ok, let's use the binomial formula to determine the probability of these outcomes (at least I would, because I think the win probability changed, but I can use a coin flip calculator until you disagree with 50/50).
Chances of 0-11 are 1 ÷ 2¹¹ ≈ 0.0005 = 0.05%
Chances of 3-3 are 31.25%
Chances of 1-6 are 9.375%
Chances of 8-2 are 10.938%
These outcomes are not likely. Only 3-3 ended up as the most likely outcome if we assume 50% win rate. I think the Lions went from 25% to 50% in 2021 and then from 50% to 75% in 2022.
I understand that any particular record has a small chance of occurrence but these outcomes are not consistent with any kind of expectation that win rate remains constant."Yeah, we just... we don't want them to go. So that's our motivation."
Dan Campbell at Green Bay, January 8, 2023.
- Top
Comment
-
Originally posted by Iron Lion View Post
Gonna have to give a very hard pass on that take.
0-11-1, then 3-3
1-6, then 8-2
No statistician on earth will think that the win probability has remained the same from start to finish. And what would you call the win chance? 50/50 if we agree to ignore the tie? Ok, let's use the binomial formula to determine the probability of these outcomes (at least I would, because I think the win probability changed, but I can use a coin flip calculator until you disagree with 50/50).
Chances of 0-11 are 1 ÷ 2¹¹ ≈ 0.0005 = 0.05%
Chances of 3-3 are 31.25%
Chances of 1-6 are 9.375%
Chances of 8-2 are 10.938%
These outcomes are not likely. Only 3-3 ended up as the most likely outcome if we assume 50% win rate. I think the Lions went from 25% to 50% in 2021 and then from 50% to 75% in 2022.
I understand that any particular record has a small chance of occurrence but these outcomes are not consistent with any kind of expectation that win rate remains constant.
- Top
Comment
-
Originally posted by chemiclord View Post
What they would tell you is that a sample size of two seasons wouldn't be NEARLY enough data to support your hypothesis conclusively. That's all."Yeah, we just... we don't want them to go. So that's our motivation."
Dan Campbell at Green Bay, January 8, 2023.
- Top
Comment
-
What does Matt Patricia have to do with any of this?
All that I said was that two seasons is an awfully small sample size to make a grand statement like Campbell's teams always finish stronger than they start.
If you had claimed Matt Patricia's teams always finish with 6 or less wins, that would also be true, also would be an awfully small sample size, and not be something too many people outside of maybe Matt Millen and Ol' Willie Ford would want to test with scientific rigor.
Happy to help... I guess?
- Top
Comment
-
Originally posted by dpatnod View PostShirley, you can't be 'totally sold' on a coach with such a small sample size to judge by?
Sorry, I won't declare SOL dead until the Lions win a playoff game. Deal with it.
- Top
Comment
Comment