If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
If you are having difficulty logging in, please REFRESH the page and clear your browser cache and try again.
If you still can't get logged in, please try using Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome, Firefox, Opera, or Safari to login. Also be sure you are using the latest version of your browser. Internet Explorer has not been updated in over seven years and will no longer work with the Forum software. Thanks
Also, I think NY still needs redrawn. We’ll see how that settles. And I do like Nathaniel, but he’s obviously a D. The gerrymanders in Massachusetts and Illinois are stellar. Florida is right there.
Oh, and it’s unclear where Ohio ends up.
Anyway 7 > 1
Dan Patrick: What was your reaction to [Urban Meyer being hired]? Brady Hoke: You know.....not....good.
Ok, but let’s ignore 7>1 and take Nathaniel’s gloss and say R+4. Let’s see if Rs pick up more than 4 in November. With this huge pro-abortion bump that seems unlikely,
But if the Rs pick up more than 4 then the GERRYMANDERING!!! excuse is gone. GONE.
So, I guess someone will quoting someone in November even though quoting people is blatantly unfair. But, it’s coming.
Dan Patrick: What was your reaction to [Urban Meyer being hired]? Brady Hoke: You know.....not....good.
Anything more than 4 (currently—could change a little), and the gerrymandering excuse is totally shit on. Fortunately, Ds have a dozen other excuses to delegitimize elections.
Dan Patrick: What was your reaction to [Urban Meyer being hired]? Brady Hoke: You know.....not....good.
November doesn't matter. The discussion, that you tried to redirect, was whether states would ban abortion or not even though the majority of Americas don't want a ban.
But again, you know that
I feel like I am watching the destruction of our democracy while my neighbors and friends cheer it on
November doesn't matter. The discussion, that you tried to redirect, was whether states would ban abortion or not even though the majority of Americas don't want a ban.
But again, you know that
Why are you citing a 538 article on federal gerrymandering if states are the issue? Why scream gerrymandering and cite federal gerrymandering and say its states?
Hard to hit a moving target. Can definitely understand why you quickly dispensed your 538 argument after I destroyed that.
As for states, where it abortion and s popular it’ll be legal. Where it isn’t it will be limited or not legal. Reiterating, again, that most states have a direct democracy option that bypasses the gerrymandering argument.
Alabama has no such bypass and will ban abortion totally or significantly because that’s what the people of Alabama want. Democracy will produce a result that conforms to the will of the people.
Don’t know where you’re going to move goalposts next but it’s fun watching your capitulation.
Packing the USSC
Make Wash DC a "state" creating 2 eternal Dem Senate seats
Make PR a state and see above
Eliminate the filibuster
Place the Feds (read: Dems) in charge of all elections
= making things "right"
Got it.
"What you're doing, speaks so loudly, that I can't hear what you are saying"
I think I broke CGVT. Tough for him swimming in the deep end. But, admittedly, it’s a fun challenge to play wack-a-mole with the ever shifting bad arguments until he just waives the white flag.
I do, btw, appreciate quoting something I didn’t say. Heh. Gold.
Packing the USSC
Make Wash DC a "state" creating 2 eternal Dem Senate seats
Make PR a state and see above
Eliminate the filibuster
Place the Feds (read: Dems) in charge of all elections
= making things "right"
Got it.
Annnnnnnnd.... none of that shit has happened. The Dems are too busy grooming children.
I feel like I am watching the destruction of our democracy while my neighbors and friends cheer it on
Tweet
Comment